Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Dojo Five (4.5/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for RFPs needing hardware and firmware scoped under one vendor. Dojo Five is the stronger option for FDA-ready firmware for connected medical devices and diagnostics. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Dojo Five |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2018 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | Saint Paul, MN, USA |
| Team size | 200+ | 26 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | In-house hardware lab plus NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status covers both the board bring-up and firmware line items in a single SOW | Firmware delivery scoped exclusively around FDA-regulated medical device and diagnostics programs, not a general embedded practice |
| Pricing model | Firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation | Project-based firmware engagements for medical device programs |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Azure RTOS | C, C++, Medical Device Firmware Standards |
| Industries served | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive | Medical devices, Diagnostics |
Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions was founded in 2007 in Lviv, Ukraine and has grown to a 200+ person team with additional offices in Hamburg, London, and Kraków. Its engagement scope runs from RTOS and bare-metal firmware architecture through embedded GUI work, secure boot and OTA update design, and hardware validation in its own lab with oscilloscopes, evaluation kits, and hardware-in-the-loop testing capability. Direct partnership status with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip, plus ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications, gives a procurement team the kind of verifiable vendor-qualification evidence an RFP typically asks for, and the company transfers full IP and source code rights to the client on delivery.
Dojo Five
Dojo Five was founded in 2018 and is headquartered in Saint Paul, Minnesota with a team of 26 engineers. The firm's stated scope is narrow and deliberate: production-ready embedded firmware for connected medical devices and diagnostics, delivered on time and on budget, without the broader industrial or consumer electronics work that dilutes focus at larger firms. For an RFP built around a specific medical device program, that narrowness reads as depth rather than a limitation, since every engineer on the team works inside the same regulatory and reliability constraints day to day.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Dojo Five |
|---|---|---|
| Firmware development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hardware / PCB co-design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Functional safety / certification | ✓ | ✓ |
| Defense / aerospace credentials | ✗ | ✗ |
| Medical device firmware | ✗ | ✓ |
| Secure firmware updates | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded Linux | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Dojo Five |
|---|---|---|
| C | ✓ | ✓ |
| C++ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| PCB Design | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
| MISRA C | ✓ | N/A |
| ITAR | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| ASIL | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Dojo Five |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Firmware consulting, Design-phase engagement, Full development lifecycle, Staff augmentation | Project-based firmware development |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Dojo Five |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging), Transportation & Logistics | Medical devices, Diagnostics |
| Best use cases | RFP requiring hardware validation, firmware development, and compliance documentation in one response, Secure OTA update infrastructure for a fleet of connected devices already in the field | Firmware development for a connected diagnostic device ahead of FDA submission, Production-ready firmware handoff for a medical device already through concept and hardware design |
| Typical project type | Firmware consulting | Project-based firmware development |
Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | In-house hardware lab covers board bring-up and HIL validation, a line item many pure-firmware vendors subcontract out |
| + | ISO 9001, ISO 27001, and ISO 13485 certifications give a procurement team documented evidence for vendor qualification checklists |
| + | Direct NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status is independently verifiable against each vendor's own partner directory |
| + | Engagement models span consulting, design-phase, full lifecycle, and staff augmentation, matching how most RFPs are structured |
| + | Full IP and source code transfer on delivery removes a common negotiation point in vendor contracts |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, so a manufacturing line item still needs a separate contractor |
| - | Does not submit regulatory certification filings on the client's behalf, only the supporting technical documentation |
| - | No published minimum engagement figure, so budget fit for a specific RFP needs a scoping call |
| Dojo Five | |
|---|---|
| + | Sole focus on connected medical devices and diagnostics means the entire team works inside FDA-relevant constraints, not a fraction of it |
| + | Stated commitment to on-time, on-budget delivery is a specific procurement claim, not a generic marketing line |
| + | 7 years of operating history built entirely around this one vertical |
| + | Small team size gives a procurement contact direct access to senior firmware engineers rather than account layers |
| - | 26 engineers caps concurrent capacity; an RFP needing parallel workstreams across several device programs may need to confirm bench depth first |
| - | Its medical-device-only focus is a narrower fit for an RFP spanning non-medical hardware categories |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: RFP requiring hardware validation, firmware development, and compliance documentation in one response.
In-house hardware lab plus NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status covers both the board bring-up and firmware line items in a single SOW. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging), Transportation & Logistics, Manufacturing & Industrial IoT, Consumer Electronics, Automotive.
Who should choose Dojo Five?
A typical fit: firmware development for a connected diagnostic device ahead of FDA submission.
Firmware delivery scoped exclusively around FDA-regulated medical device and diagnostics programs, not a general embedded practice. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices, Diagnostics.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Dojo Five (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Dojo Five fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| RFP requiring hardware validation, firmware development, and compliance documentation in one response | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Secure OTA update infrastructure for a fleet of connected devices already in the field | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Firmware development for a connected diagnostic device ahead of FDA submission | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Production-ready firmware handoff for a medical device already through concept and hardware design | Limited | Strong | Dojo Five |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Embedded Firmware projects. In-house hardware lab plus NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status covers both the board bring-up and firmware line items in a single SOW.
Dojo Five (4.5/5) is worth a look if you need production-ready firmware handoff for a medical device already through concept and hardware design. If your situation matches that, Dojo Five is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Dojo Five FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Dojo Five?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: in-house hardware lab covers board bring-up and HIL validation, a line item many pure-firmware vendors subcontract out. Dojo Five's strongest advantage: sole focus on connected medical devices and diagnostics means the entire team works inside FDA-relevant constraints, not a fraction of it.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Dojo Five differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses firmware consulting, design-phase engagement, full development lifecycle, or staff augmentation pricing. Dojo Five uses project-based firmware engagements for medical device programs pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Dojo Five?
Lemberg Solutions is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each service provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Dojo Five?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: in-house hardware lab plus NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip partner status covers both the board bring-up and firmware line items in a single SOW. Dojo Five's primary differentiator is: firmware delivery scoped exclusively around FDA-regulated medical device and diagnostics programs, not a general embedded practice. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 26), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare (FDA, HIPAA, IEC 62304, ISO 13485), Energy (battery management, EV charging) vs Medical devices, Diagnostics).
Verify all details directly with each service provider before making a decision.